laura piskorski sorted by
relevance

Admin25.06.2021

PISKORSKI

Agricultural law — For any concern, such as land use, water rights or regulatory issues, our lawyers can guide you toward a successful outcome.
7003
Admin24.08.2021

Celebrities

The denial of that motion is the basis for the defendant's present claim of error.
8900
Admin27.07.2021

State v. Piskorski :: 1979 :: Connecticut Supreme Court Decisions :: Connecticut Case Law :: Connecticut Law :: US Law :: Justia

17 Mb Cybergirl Chandler South gets all wet in this set from photographer Jennifer Vaughn.
1608
Admin01.08.2021

Celebrities

Herman: Well, now, that doesn't answer the question, if the court pleases.
7602
Admin07.08.2021

Celebrities

The defendant argues that it was error to allow the admission of these photographs into evidence claiming that they were highly inflammatory and that the prejudicial effect of these photographs far outweighed any probative value derived therefrom.
8701
Admin18.08.2021

Barack Obama: Organizing for America 2.0

[6] On the basis of the above, the defendant argues that the pretrial publicity in this case was "inherently prejudicial" or, in the alternative, "identifiably prejudicial" so as to render the trial court's denial of his motion for a change of venue constitutional error.
7400
Admin28.07.2021

State v. Piskorski :: 1979 :: Connecticut Supreme Court Decisions :: Connecticut Case Law :: Connecticut Law :: US Law :: Justia

[19] Thereafter, the witness underwent an extensive cross-examination regarding various aspects of his testimony.
6703
Admin24.08.2021

State v. Piskorski :: 1979 :: Connecticut Supreme Court Decisions :: Connecticut Case Law :: Connecticut Law :: US Law :: Justia

As related in Part VIII, infra, Noury further testified: on the night of October 19, 1974, he observed the defendant holding under a faucet what appeared to be the pistol the defendant had obtained from him and washing "something red" off it; Schrager handed the defendant the shotgun which Mindek had sold to him; at the defendant's request, Noury drove him to a point where they stopped by a pond; the defendant took a bandanna from his head and put the pistol and some wallets in it and left the car, returning without them; and the two then drove back to New Britainthe defendant having possession of the shotgun during the drive.
2603
Admin02.08.2021

Barack Obama: Organizing for America 2.0

Moreover, we have consistently recognized that a careful, cautionary instruction given by the trial court is a relevant factor to be considered in determining whether the denial of such a motion constituted an abuse of the trial court's broad discretion.
38010